Book Review - The Message of the Psalms- Theological commentary: Brueggemann Walter


Brueggemann Walter: The Message of the Psalms- Theological commentary: Augsburg, Minneapolis, Augsburg publishing house, 1984. 206 pp.

Walter Brueggemann is professor of Old Testament at the Columbia Theological Seminary, Decatur, Georgia. He has authored other books like Prophetic Imagination, Finally comes the Poet, Interpretation and Obedience, An Introduction to Old Testament, and Christian Imagination and The Psalms and the life of Faith.

In this book the author is brings to attention the need to study Psalms and pre-critical study. He assumes the great deposit of critical scholarship that is indispensable for study of the Psalms. The author is dependant on and do take seriously that fund of critical learning. He utilizes a scheme of Orientation, Disorientation and New orientation which he says he does not want them to be straitjacket. The Author tries to show the gain in this book by pointing out to the Psalms of Negativity, i. e. the complains of various kinds, the crisis for vengeance and profound penitence are fundamental to life of faith as one study the Psalms. He drives this point home by saying that the Psalms are profoundly subversive of the dominant culture, which want to deny and cover over the darkness we are called to enter. He argues the Psalms do not permit us to ignore and deny the darkness, personally or publicly, which he observes is where life begins.

Although many readers don’t see this, the author asserts that the Psalms are not only addressed to God. They are a voice of the Gospel, God’s good words addressed to God’s faithful people. In the Psalms literature the community of faith has heard and continues to hear the sovereign speech of God, who meets the community in its depths of need and in its heights of celebration. He observes that the Psalms draws our entire life under the rule of God where everything must be submitted. P 15. The author pursues a post critical reading of the Psalms and considers critical gains made by other scholars like Gunkel, Mowinckel, and Westermann. He bases his discussion on the three general themes mentioned earlier, Poems of orientation, poems of disorientation and poems of new orientation. The author having grouped Psalms in this way he deals with three areas namely, A- Joy Delight, goodness, coherence, etc. These he argues are Psalms that express a confident, serene settlement of faith issues. They are Psalms that describe how things are and indeed always are. P 25. He further says that the function of these Psalms
is to praise and thank God. Which he observes that they become a means in which we see God as the true creator creating the world. B- Ragged pain disarray- here he looks at life as not a straight line. Life is marked by disequilibrium, incoherence, and unrelieved asymmetry p, 51. C- New gift from God and also fresh intrusion that makes all things new. He asserts that from disorientation there is new orientation, the new life when none has been expected. He points out that new orientation is not a return to the old stable orientation. He cites Psalms 30 as a good example here. P, 120.

The author is aware that there can be doubt that Psalms are an important resource for spirituality and have been so for countless generations. He argues that his presentation of the psalms have assumed authentic spirituality. He points out that genuine communion with God is never removed from seasons, turns, and crises or life. The question of theodicy he says is never a narrow religious question. Further he points out that theodicy question cannot be reduced to or contained in a narrow question about God. He asserts threat theodicy operates in time of equilibrium as well as in time of crisis, p 170. The Psalms of disorientation occur and make sense when the consensus about theodicy has collapsed and there is crisis in the order of life. He asserts that at this point the speech is incredibly bold because the speaker has nowhere to address the speech except back to the same agent. The author points out that spirituality by itself is an inadequate basis for reading the Psalms. Like in the Psalms of new orientation, celebrate a new settlement of the issue of theodicy. The crisis is past and there is once again a stable situation for social life. He points out that the Psalms of new orientation speaks about the new state when life is whole and well ordered, when the system is just and when God is known to be righteous and just.

As he draws conclusion on his arguments the author points out that the Psalms are resources for spirituality. He says that the Psalms regularly insist upon equality, power, and freedom enough to live by. p 176. Thus looking at the theological dimension the author provide a clear link among focal comments of the Christian faith and seasons in our life of dying and being raised. He observed that if the Psalms can be understood with the knowing sensitivities, our own use of them will have more depth and significance in the practice of both Jews and Christian forms of biblical faith. The Psalms have the power they have for us because we know life to be that.

As author reviewer of “The Message of Psalms” by Brueggemann, the following observations were made. A- the author reached his audience with the message that he wanted to communicate in the pages of this book the main aim here was to lead his readers to see Psalms a book to be used in the Christian churches for worship as other books are used. He points out that the Psalms are as rich as other books we know in the bible. And his emphasis on the use of Psalms that are not commonly used by the Christian church, i.e. the Lament Psalms. This reviewer agrees with the author that Psalms has not been used the way they are supposed to be used. Observing that many a people feel that using the Lament Psalms many mean to express their doubt and question God. But the author feels that this is important for it strengthens people’s faith. B- that life is full in stages that he calls orientation. It is clear from him that Psalms are not only about the good that there is, but also the bad that life has to offer. This is without doubt for life have both ups and downs. And as the author argues in all these stages of life, God is the one to be relied upon.

However, the following questions would not escape the reviewers mind: Why does the author says what he says? And how well has the author reached his audience? First the reviewer feels that in the eyes of the author the Psalms are neglected piece of literature. He thus puts forth the importance of it so that his readers can start using the Psalm in the pulpit for example. Or say it in another, that although the Psalms have been used, this has been done selectively neglecting some that are very vital in the Christian life. Thus the emphasis to look at the Psalms and use them at all times, i. e disorientation. Secondly, this small book has great impact on those who read it. The reviewer, confesses that it has charged the opinion that he had about the Psalms saying that he find meaning to preach from them including the Lament Psalms. So it is the feeling of the reviewer that author has reached his targeted audience.

Recommendations:

This small book is worthy reading by those people who preach the word of God- for it exposes one on how to approach the situations of people as they come. It will help one to be able to make use of Psalms at all stages of life as they approach. It’s recommended to theological students and all preachers of the good news.

PART TWO - The first Disciples of Jesus - John 1:35-51


Series Title: Encountering Jesus, Strengthening our faith as we explore/ journey through the fourth Gospel.

Series Focus. A study of what it means to be Children of God. The One who lived, among us through Jesus.

Sermon Title: The first disciple of Jesus.

Sermon Text: John 1:35-51

Sermon Subject: How do we become true disciples of Jesus who calls us to himself?

Sermon objective: To create awareness among my congregation on the call to Christian Faith- discipleship

Introduction

In our first sermon in this series, we concluded by a question which ought to be our starting point in part two. How then should we be true disciple? The lesion in focus is important not only because it record the first beginnings of the faith of a particular disciple, but also because it introduces the interpretation of the words in the opening of the fourth gospel. “The Word became flesh and dwelt among us.”v14. as seen in the first sermon.

The calling of the first disciple is kind of uniform. I may want us to look at this section as a map to our Christian journey of inclusion.

Vv 35-37, John the Baptist saw Jesus and he pointed his own disciple to him. Here we see John the Baptist with two of his disciples who did not hesitate after being told of Jesus. To them this was a clear and sufficient indication that time has come for them to leave their master and follow the new found Master.

Vv 38-39, Jesus’ encounter with the first two Disciples. For the two disciples it was not easy to leave the one they know and follow the one they have been hearing of. Every call has its roughness and of course better side. To them Jesus asked what they wanted. It does not sound friendly or welcoming. Does it?

Vv 40-42, Simon was brought to Jesus. Most commentators have called this section evangelism by brother. It introduces to us one of the two disciples Andrew, who is identified as the brother to Peter. He found his own brother Simon and brought him to Christ,

Vv 43-44, Again Jesus call Phillip. By simple words “follow me” Phillip was made a disciple

Vv 45-51, Nathaniel brought to Jesus by Phillip. As Andrew did to Simon, Phillip found Nathaniel and points him to Jesus.

Explanation

The first unnamed disciples of John take him by his simple words as he pointed them to Jesus. They maynot have grasped the depth of the meaning of “lamb of God” But it is evident that they probably understood that John was pointing this Man (Jesus) out to them as the coming one of who he had spoken before. Reading this Verse alone it does not tell us that they had heard about him before this. All the same they were eager to know more about him

Jesus invited them to go with him. An invitation that they had scarcely dared to hope was extended to them- “Come and see”- v 39. The same invitation is to those who want to know him better.

In verse 40 Andrew is named as one of the two who followed Jesus after John pointed them to him. He brings his own Brother Simon to Jesus. How wonderful it is for family member to introduce the other to Christ. This is what I teamed as our map to introducing others to Christ. Andrew began his evangelism in Jerusalem. What many people refer to as at door step. What point would it make if he followed alone without involving his brother?


In the following verse, we notice Jesus taking the initiative to involve himself in calling of disciples. It seems that Jesus and his new disciples, namely Andrew, Simon and the other unnamed to this point who was John’s disciple are working as a team to bring others closer. See v 43the next day Jesus decided to go to Galilee. He found Phillip…..” And the number of disciple became four. Notice teamwork. See also the Method that all of them use to bring others in.

Phillip was not also to be left out in the campaign. He found Nathaniel and by his witness
brought him to Jesus. As many will doubt the truth as told to them, This is clear in John 1:11 “He came to that which was his own, but his own did not receive him.”It seemed incredible to Nathaniel that obscure Nazareth could be home of the promised one. notice the words Phillip used to convince him of Jesus. “come and see” v 46. Jesus used the same words to Andrew and the other disciple. They seem to be magical words. Jesus does not only know him by name, but also by character. He is a true Israel. Jesus knows his own by name. The proof of Jesus miraculous power overwhelms Nathaniel and he had to confess that Jesus his the son of God, king of Israel.

Nathaniel might have known Jesus even before he was brought to him by Phillip. He may have heard about him. look at the title he gives him King of Israel. He may have known him way back before but he had not confess him as such. This is very common of most Christians today. Many christians know who God is through Christ but they do not want to belief it and confess. Taking a step forward as Nathaniel is an important step towards christian maturity.

Illustration

A Methodist bishop once preached on a sermon Titled "Fishing on other people’s baskets.” The encounter of the disciple of John with Jesus seems as though Jesus is making disciples out of what other have made. The bishop concluded his sermon by saying there are many people who work very little waiting to harvest much.

This is but a poor illustration which shows how Jesus made is first disciples.

Application


Here we see John the Baptist point beyond himself. There was no jealousy in him. His aim is to bring men not to himself but to Jesus. How do we point others to Jesus? Are we doing it as John did or we keep what we know about Jesus to ourselves?

Here we have the symbol of divine initiative. Jesus turned and spoke to them. See v 38.
It is always God who takes the first step. When we begin to seek and search in vain, God comes to meet us far more that halfway.
ar
Christians should put ourselves in the shoes of Andrew. Most of us may not know who Andrew was, for he lived under the shadow of Peter his brother. William Barclay points out that Andrew was not one of the inner circles of disciples. Note that we know his brother Peter more who is in the forefront even to a point of going with Jesus to mount of transfiguration. Andrew never resented this for example. Andrew was quite content to stand back and let his brother have the lime light... To him matters of precedence and place of honor mattered nothing at all. Is this not a quality that each of as may desire to have? All that mattered to him was to be with Jesus and serve him. We should desire the same as his followers.

Finally I may want us look at Phillip and Nathaniel Phillip could not keep the good news to himself. He found his friend Nathaniel and told him. Note that Nathaniel was positioning himself for arguments, but Phillip simply said to him “Come and see.” This is wisdom. When we introduce people to Christ, most times they enter into arguments. Which most times do more harm than good? The only way to do it in a more Christly manner is to point them to Christ.

I know many Christians who have gone into arguments about their faith and believe, and they become more hurt in the process. Be a pointer to the truth. We are his disciples, ours is to follow as he leads.

Conclusion

I am thrilled by the response of these men who were called to follow Jesus. They seem to be humble men of prayer and search hungering for the truth as they see in the Messiah. Shouldn’t this be our desire too?

Their desire to follow as disciples leaving what they have to be with Jesus is amazing. Most of them as we have seen, have found what they have been looking for.

It could be well if every now and again we were to ask ourselves, what we are looking for. What are we looking for in life? What is the aim that we have as a Christian?

In the series, the story is a great one in the sense that it tells how Jesus looks at man. He looks and sees what man will become. See how he talks about peter. He saw him as one who would become the rock on which to build his church. About Nathaniel he said to him that he is a true Israelite on who there is no guile.

Jesus looks at men and sees the possibilities in them. “He says give your life to me and I will make you what you have it in you to be”

William Barclay- Commentary on the Gospel of John, Vol 1