Rudolf Bultmann: Schubert M. Ogden Ed: New Testament & mythology, and other basic writings: Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1989. 168 pp
Rudolf Bultmann ( 1884 – 1976) was the most influential New testament scholar of the twentieth century. Bultmann has written other books like, History of the Synoptic Tradition, Theology of the New Testament, The Gospel of John, and The Johannine Epistles. Others works my him include, Primitive Christianity, faith and Understanding. Bultmann was a Christian theologian.
Among Bultmanns books this is the most discussed and controversial theological writings of the century. In this book the editor has pointed out that this is no doubt a reply to bultmann’s critics. He deals with the problem of hermeneutics as an earlier advance the discussion. By directly addressing the most fundamental problem that his demand for demythologizing raises, at once surveying the modern history, he is proposing a constructive solution to it. From these essays the author seems to understand the distinctive task of theology to lie precisely in securing the appropriate concepts in which to interpret the Christian witness. Readers of this book will appreciate how Bultmannn himself labored at this task and how careful he was about his own theological conceptuality. As most of you will enjoy reading this short summary, you are encouraged to read the book and find out the rich treasures there are in.
The author talks about the mythical word picture and the mythical salvation occurrence in the New Testament which he says-all this is a world of mythical picture. All readers who are Christians will appreciate that the author gives a picture of the world as he know it. He describes the world as three story structure, which has earth heaven and hell. He further tries to tell his readers that heaven is the dwelling place of God and heavenly creatures mostly referred to as angles. God rules over these three stories. Therefore man is not his own master, for God direct his thinking and the demons too can posses them. He is very clear that those who are in Christ are God’s and he or she is bound to him by baptism and the Lord’s super. Pg 2.The author asserts that believers are the first fruits to be the children of God. Thus they have their master who rulers over them. On the Mythical world picture the author asks if men and women can acknowledge it. On the some note he points out that naturally it is not unalterable, and even an individual can work to change it. A good example that the author gives here is the mythical eschatology which is finished basically by the simple fact that Christ’s parousia did not take place immediately as the New Testament aspect it to, but he says the world continues and every competent judge is convinced will continue. He says there are many doctrines that can not be understood, and likewise no one can understand i. e Jesus’ resurrection.
In trying the make it better understood, the author points out that the real point about myth is not to give an objective world picture, what is expressed in it, rather he argues that it is how human beings understand themselves in the world. Myth therefore does not need to be interpreted in the cosmological terms but in anthropological ones. He argues that there is a problem in demythologizing i.e. the occurrence of Christ. He is quick to point out that the Christ occurrence is not myth like the cult myth of the Greek or Hellenistic, but he says that the Jesus Christ was God, a pre-existent divine being (pg 32) who is far remote from being a myth.
The author tries again to introduce a subject that seems somehow complicated for his readers to comprehend. He discusses Theology as science; he argues that the object of science is evident in its not being interested in particular results of its research. He asserts that it seeks nothing except to allow the object as such to show itself and to find expression. The author points out that any science work presupposes a presceitific relation to its object in which a certain understanding of is already included. He gives an example saying that the science of history is appropriate if only if only the historian has relation to the subject matter with which the history ha concerned and if this very relation guides his or her historical understanding.
In summary the author says that it is impossible to go into all the critical contents and to respond to all of the questions addressed to his since the first appearance of his essay. He tries to clarify the questions that seems to him most important. The author is struggling to explain the myth and mythologizing so that his readers may understand. Dealing with these topics readers will agree that are difficult ones to deal with. For example the author says that demythologizing is a procedure that inquires about the reality referred to mythology texts. Any one who reads the book will first struggle with the definition of terms and also will deal with terms that are not too familiar.
However, it is important to note that the issue that seems too difficult to deal with, that is demythologizing is an important tool to the pulpit people. This kind of topic has not been dealt with by many scholars, so bultmann has set the table for the now and the future of theologians. As Thomas asserts this is a useful tool in any theological course. This book is a worth one to read. Those that have read it would recommend it to their theological counter parts for it has theological insights that will help every reader in this century. Moreover, it is by reading carefully of these writings that can be co noted to yield an understanding of the whole book, better than summarized in these few pages. It is referred to as basic writing to understand the world pictures of the New Testament and so it is. Those that are taking this proposal have no alternative but to read all of the writings that will bring them to a better understanding of what Bultmann calls mythology. Unlike other books the author has detailed work which is worthy looking at.
Rudolf Bultmann ( 1884 – 1976) was the most influential New testament scholar of the twentieth century. Bultmann has written other books like, History of the Synoptic Tradition, Theology of the New Testament, The Gospel of John, and The Johannine Epistles. Others works my him include, Primitive Christianity, faith and Understanding. Bultmann was a Christian theologian.
Among Bultmanns books this is the most discussed and controversial theological writings of the century. In this book the editor has pointed out that this is no doubt a reply to bultmann’s critics. He deals with the problem of hermeneutics as an earlier advance the discussion. By directly addressing the most fundamental problem that his demand for demythologizing raises, at once surveying the modern history, he is proposing a constructive solution to it. From these essays the author seems to understand the distinctive task of theology to lie precisely in securing the appropriate concepts in which to interpret the Christian witness. Readers of this book will appreciate how Bultmannn himself labored at this task and how careful he was about his own theological conceptuality. As most of you will enjoy reading this short summary, you are encouraged to read the book and find out the rich treasures there are in.
The author talks about the mythical word picture and the mythical salvation occurrence in the New Testament which he says-all this is a world of mythical picture. All readers who are Christians will appreciate that the author gives a picture of the world as he know it. He describes the world as three story structure, which has earth heaven and hell. He further tries to tell his readers that heaven is the dwelling place of God and heavenly creatures mostly referred to as angles. God rules over these three stories. Therefore man is not his own master, for God direct his thinking and the demons too can posses them. He is very clear that those who are in Christ are God’s and he or she is bound to him by baptism and the Lord’s super. Pg 2.The author asserts that believers are the first fruits to be the children of God. Thus they have their master who rulers over them. On the Mythical world picture the author asks if men and women can acknowledge it. On the some note he points out that naturally it is not unalterable, and even an individual can work to change it. A good example that the author gives here is the mythical eschatology which is finished basically by the simple fact that Christ’s parousia did not take place immediately as the New Testament aspect it to, but he says the world continues and every competent judge is convinced will continue. He says there are many doctrines that can not be understood, and likewise no one can understand i. e Jesus’ resurrection.
In trying the make it better understood, the author points out that the real point about myth is not to give an objective world picture, what is expressed in it, rather he argues that it is how human beings understand themselves in the world. Myth therefore does not need to be interpreted in the cosmological terms but in anthropological ones. He argues that there is a problem in demythologizing i.e. the occurrence of Christ. He is quick to point out that the Christ occurrence is not myth like the cult myth of the Greek or Hellenistic, but he says that the Jesus Christ was God, a pre-existent divine being (pg 32) who is far remote from being a myth.
The author tries again to introduce a subject that seems somehow complicated for his readers to comprehend. He discusses Theology as science; he argues that the object of science is evident in its not being interested in particular results of its research. He asserts that it seeks nothing except to allow the object as such to show itself and to find expression. The author points out that any science work presupposes a presceitific relation to its object in which a certain understanding of is already included. He gives an example saying that the science of history is appropriate if only if only the historian has relation to the subject matter with which the history ha concerned and if this very relation guides his or her historical understanding.
In summary the author says that it is impossible to go into all the critical contents and to respond to all of the questions addressed to his since the first appearance of his essay. He tries to clarify the questions that seems to him most important. The author is struggling to explain the myth and mythologizing so that his readers may understand. Dealing with these topics readers will agree that are difficult ones to deal with. For example the author says that demythologizing is a procedure that inquires about the reality referred to mythology texts. Any one who reads the book will first struggle with the definition of terms and also will deal with terms that are not too familiar.
However, it is important to note that the issue that seems too difficult to deal with, that is demythologizing is an important tool to the pulpit people. This kind of topic has not been dealt with by many scholars, so bultmann has set the table for the now and the future of theologians. As Thomas asserts this is a useful tool in any theological course. This book is a worth one to read. Those that have read it would recommend it to their theological counter parts for it has theological insights that will help every reader in this century. Moreover, it is by reading carefully of these writings that can be co noted to yield an understanding of the whole book, better than summarized in these few pages. It is referred to as basic writing to understand the world pictures of the New Testament and so it is. Those that are taking this proposal have no alternative but to read all of the writings that will bring them to a better understanding of what Bultmann calls mythology. Unlike other books the author has detailed work which is worthy looking at.
